My Microsoft Windows 98 file opened up without problems on his Mac. The Unlimited version arrives on two CD-ROMs that must both be installed for database-Web connectivity.īut the product isn't perfect, and some features in the latest version might leave veteran FileMaker users frustrated.įor example, I exchanged FileMaker files with another reviewer who was testing the Apple Macintosh version. It takes about four hours to complete, demonstrating procedures for tasks as basic as how to find specific data to using relational databases in general.įileMaker Pro 5 also comes in an "Unlimited" version, which lets you publish databases to the Web for an unlimited number of clients. Then I set out to test FileMaker's prowess at database management.Īn effective, interactive tutorial showed how to use the program and did a good job of keeping me awake. Its functions, instructions, and sheer ease and logic make it well worth the $250 price.ĭespite some flaws, I found FileMaker logical in its operations from the moment I launched it.įor example, it took me only 45 minutes-without reading any instructions-to create a test database of work-related contacts from the past two months. ![]() If you're not a certified Oracle database manager and don't know how to use Microsoft SQL Server 7 but you do know your way around a computer, FileMaker is a good choice. ![]() The makers of the four leading desktop databases all make the same claim: Our product is the best and the easiest to use.īut how suitable is Microsoft Access 2000 for small departmental or workgroup use? Can Lotus Approach 9.5 make database work more approachable? Is Corel Paradox 9 easy or paradoxical? Can you become a pro at FileMaker Pro 5 without too much effort?Īfter reviewing these products, I found that FileMaker Pro 5 delivers the best overall value.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |